Re: [PATCH] git-pack-objects.txt: fix grammatical errors
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 23 quoted lines
> Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net> writes:
>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt b/Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt
> >> index a51071e..442018b 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/git-pack-objects.txt
> >> @@ -190,9 +190,9 @@ self-contained. Use `git index-pack --fix-thin`
> >> (see linkgit:git-index-pack[1]) to restore the self-contained property.
> >>
> >> --delta-base-offset::
> >> + A packed archive can express the base object of a delta as
> >> + either a 20-byte object name or as an offset in the
> >> + stream, but older versions of git don't understand the
> >> latter. By default, 'git pack-objects' only uses the
> >> former format for better compatibility. This option
> >> allows the command to use the latter format for
> >
> > This is misleading and not even true anymore if not using pack-objects.
> > Most people are using either 'git repack' or even 'git gc', and the
> > default is to use this parameter since commit 22c79eab.
>
> This page is on the pack-objects plumbing, and in that context there is
> nothing misleading nor false about it.
> We may however want to do something like the attached to help people who
> might wonder how to pass this option through the Porcelain they use.
That's the kind of precision I was meaning.
> the longer term, it probably makes sense to make the option default at a
> version bump, perhaps at the 1.8.0 boundary.