Show 22 quoted lines
> On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 04:03:30PM +0200, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 15:58, Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at> wrote:
> >
> > > I could not make much sense of the thread that came with the patch.
> > > The discussion first seems to conclude that it is a bad idea, only
> > > to implement it anyway.
> >
> > I think it would be useful here to have some links to relevant posts,
> > or at least to the relevant thread.
>
> The discussion ends with this posting
> http://mid.gmane.org/7viqesz3mk.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org ,
> which basically says "we all agree this is bad."
>
> Then Junio changes his mind his mind and posts the patches.
> http://mid.gmane.org/7vzl7pyvzl.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org
>
> Whether the feature has merit or not is suddenly not an issue any
> more and the discussion veers off in other directions about minor
> technical details and about the --nodwim/--noguess option, the
> notion of which I find ridiculous by the way. But it further
> illustrates how random and anti-DWIM this feature really is.