Re: bug in name-rev on linux-2.6 repo?
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Date
- Apr 22, 2010, 18:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LFD.2.00.1004221119290.26046@i5.linux-foundation.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20100422162504.GA4913@progeny.tock>
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> > Hi Ted, [ nip ] > > It seems that the committer date is set to coincide with the author > date for ext4 patches, which breaks some assumptions by git that each > commit has a later or equal committer date than all parents (modulo > some skew).
Argh. Yeah, that's just _evil_. Admittedly, git should never care, but in practice it does, because doing the whole graph walk can be _very_ expensive. So git wants to think that the committer dates at least have _some_ real-life significance.
Linus