Re: "failed to read delta base object at..."
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Date
- Aug 27, 2008, 17:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LFD.1.10.0808270937340.3363@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <48B46F46.9090302@gmail.com>
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Jason McMullan wrote:
> > All bets are off when data=writeback.
Not the way git writes pack-files. It does a fsync() before moving them into place (at least newer git versions do), so the data is stable.
I do worry about wild pointers. I can't recognize the data, and it definitely doesn't look like any git internal data structures, but 16-bit data _is_ what zlib internally uses for things like the decoding tables.
So if there is some use-after-free issue, I could imagine things like this happening inside of git. People do occasionally run valgrind on git, though, and it's been clean in the past, but I don't know if that has ever been done on the threaded packing, for example.
For example, the corrupting data had patterns like this:
00 f8 bf fe 6b 57 fe ff 55 57 fe ff 97 57 fe ff
where the pattern _could_ be something like
{ 00 f8 febf },
{ 6b 57 fffe },
{ 55 57 fffe },
{ 97 57 fffe },assuming that the "fe ff" pattern really is meaningful and is a 16-bit little-endian word.
And the thign is, zlib "code" tables look exactly like that:
typedef struct {
unsigned char op; /* operation, extra bits, table bits */
unsigned char bits; /* bits in this part of the code */
unsigned short val; /* offset in table or code value */
} code;/* op values as set by inflate_table(): 00000000 - literal 0000tttt - table link, tttt != 0 is the number of table index bits 0001eeee - length or distance, eeee is the number of extra bits 01100000 - end of block 01000000 - invalid code */
but those particular op/val things don't make sense in that context either. But I don't know zlib that well, maybe the deflate routines use some other model.
Linus