Re: [RFC PATCH] Documentation: rev-list-options: clarify history simplification with paths
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Date
- Aug 10, 2008, 19:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LFD.1.10.0808101226130.3462@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vabfk3cge.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> > Personally I do not think --full-history without --parents is of much > usefulness (I'd let Linus or somebody else defend this usage, or make it > imply revs.rewrite_parents otherwise). If you remove that case from your > set of experiments in the equation, do the rest of the results make sense?
Oh, it's _very_ useful.
The most common case is "git whatchanged". It's useful to find a commit that did some change _without_ any graphical front-end.
And then the merges and parenthood are totally pointless - no human can try to tie things together in their head _anyway_, so why show them? You just want to find the change.
Linus