Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored
- From
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
- Date
- Feb 6, 2008, 01:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LFD.1.00.0802052021250.2732@xanadu.home>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LSU.1.00.0802052228280.8543@racer.site>
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> In our case, this would mean that the revision walker should realise that > a child whose date is not older than its parent commit must be wrong. And > just take the parent's date instead (but maybe only for the purpose of > limiting).
Only for the committer's date of course. Author's date might be completely random.
Nicolas