Re: merge time
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Date
- Jul 30, 2007, 03:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LFD.0.999.0707292007440.4161@woody.linux-foundation.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <686661.84825.qm@web51011.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Matthew L Foster wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> > > but if git did what you wanted it would show every commit with the time of > > the merge, and that wouldn't help you anyway. > > Actually that is exactly what I want. I want to know what local time change X and Y (and all > changes) were merged locally.
You misunderstand. It would do so both for the newly merged commits *and* for the old commits. Because _you_ think the "new" commits got merged, but it's logically exactly equivalent to saying that the *old* commits got merged.
So now *every* single commit would get the timestamp of the merge.
See? It would be pointless.
Linus