Re: [PATCH 1/3] Lazily open pack index files on demand

> On 5/26/07, Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> wrote:
> > In other words, I think the naughty blob could simply be recognized as
> > such and be referenced in a special list instead of being written out
> > initially.  Then when everything is believed to be written, the special
> > list can be walked to force write those naughty blob at last.  No need
> > to modify the current object order.
> This works as long as a naughty blob can't be a delta base for a nice blob
> (causing it to be pushed out early by the recursion in write_one()).
> I think that's a reasonable and understandable restriction.