Re: [PATCH 11/10] allow forcing index v2 and 64-bit offset treshold

From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Date: Apr 9, 2007, 23:04 UTC
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0704091901290.28181@xanadu.home>
In-Reply-To: <7vps6dxjvb.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 14 quoted lines

> Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> writes:
> 
> > This is necessary for testing the new capabilities in some automated 
> > way without having an actual 4GB+ pack.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
> > ---
> >
> > I should write some tests... when I have more time.
> 
> It appears everybody is short of time.  I am having two
> troubles.  Nobody seems to have positive nor negative reports or
> comments on what are cooking in 'next' so nothing can graduate,
> and I am behind list discussions on certain areas myself.

At least my latest patch series received two positive reviews.  ;-)

> > ddiff --git a/t/Makefile b/t/Makefile
> 
> ???

Remnant of a change to that file which was later reverted but mtime doesn't match the index.

Nicolas