Re: Request to add option to interactive rebase to preserve latest commit date
- From
Peter Krefting <peter@softwolves.pp.se>
- Date
- May 7, 2019, 05:45 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.2.20.1905070641380.1748@perkele.intern.softwolves.pp.se>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqtve6nbfv.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
Junio C Hamano:
Show 6 quoted lines
> as merely a different way to do the following: > > $ git commit -m A > $ edit > $ edit further ;# working tree has an equivalent of C > $ git commit --amend -a
Indeed. My last command in the chain is usually
git commit --amend --date=now
to set the commit date to now. In my use-case it is often a work-in-progress commit that I start out with, which I refine over a couple of hours/days/weeks to get working properly (depending on the complexity of the change), and when I am finally done, the proper dating of the change is "now", not "when I first started doing it".
> I am still not convinced it is a good idea, but I can see how > another verb that behaves like existing "fixup" or "squash" but use > the authorship not from the updated but from the updating commit > might seem useful.
I'd be happy with a parameter and/or configuration variable saying "amend and rebase uses last commit date".
-- \\// Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/