Re: [git-for-windows] Re: Continuous Testing of Git on Windows
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Feb 14, 2017, 20:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.2.20.1702142150220.3496@virtualbox>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq60kdbqmy.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
Hi,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes: > > > That is why I taught the Git for Windows CI job that tests the four > > upstream Git integration branches to *also* bisect test breakages and > > then upload comments to the identified commit on GitHub > > Good. I do not think it is useful to try 'pu' as an aggregate and > expect it to always build and work [*1*], but your "bisect and > pinpoint" approach makes it useful to identify individual topic that > brings in a breakage.
Sadly the many different merge bases[*1*] between `next` and `pu` (which are the obvious good/bad points for bisecting automatically) bring my build agents to its knees. I may have to disable the bisecting feature as a consequence.
Ciao, Johannes
Footnote *1*: There are currently 21, some of which stemming back from a year ago. For bisecting, they all have to be tested individually, putting a major dent into bisect's otherwise speedy process.