Re: [RFC] stash: support filename argument
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jan 16, 2017, 13:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.2.20.1701161413400.3469@virtualbox>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.2.20.1701161150320.3469@virtualbox>
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> On Sun, 15 Jan 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > I haven't spent enough time to think if it even makes sense to > > "stash" partially, leaving the working tree still dirty. > > Think no more! We already support that with --keep-index, and it is a very > useful feature.
And of course there is `git stash -p`, which is also very useful, *because* it leaves the working tree still dirty, in the desired way.
Ciao, Johannes