Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2016, #07; Fri, 23)
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Oct 4, 2016, 08:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610032008370.35196@virtualbox>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqd1jpkkea.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
Hi Junio,
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 40 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>
> > In your previous kitchen status ("What's cooking") you hinted at a
> > possible v2.10.1 soon. I have a couple of bugfixes lined up for Git
> > for Windows and would like to avoid unnecessarily frequent release
> > engineering... Any more concrete ideas on a date for this version?
>
> I scanned RelNotes for 2.11 and identified these topics that we'd want
> to have in 'maint'.
>
> bw/pathspec-remove-unused-extern-decl # 1 (6 days ago)
> rs/checkout-some-states-are-const # 1 (6 days ago)
> rs/strbuf-remove-fix # 1 (6 days ago)
> rs/unpack-trees-reduce-file-scope-global # 1 (6 days ago)
> mr/vcs-svn-printf-ulong # 1 (6 days ago)
> sy/git-gui-i18n-ja # 7 (12 days ago)
> jk/fix-remote-curl-url-wo-proto # 1 (12 days ago)
> js/git-gui-commit-gpgsign # 2 (12 days ago)
> jk/patch-ids-no-merges # 2 (6 days ago)
> ew/http-do-not-forget-to-call-curl-multi-remove-handle # 3 (6 days ago)
> rs/xdiff-merge-overlapping-hunks-for-W-context # 1 (6 days ago)
> ks/perf-build-with-autoconf # 1 (6 days ago)
> jt/format-patch-base-info-above-sig # 1 (6 days ago)
> jk/rebase-i-drop-ident-check # 1 (6 days ago)
> jk/reduce-gc-aggressive-depth # 1 (6 days ago)
> et/add-chmod-x # 1 (6 days ago)
> tg/add-chmod+x-fix # 7 (24 hours ago)
>
> Most are internal clean-ups that I do not mind leaving out, but I
> think we want to have that "add --chmod=+x" fix in. As it hasn't
> been enough time passed since the topic was merged to 'master', I'd
> say either
>
> (1) 2.10.1 with everything other than the last two in a few days
> and 2.10.2 late next week with "add --chmod=+x" fix, or
>
> (2) just a single 2.10.1 with everything late next week.
>
> I can go either way and welcome suggestions. I'd start merging
> older topics in the above list to 'maint' soonish, but not today.Sorry for the delay in answering. By now, it was probably obvious to you that (2) was my preference ;-)
Thanks, Dscho