Re: [PATCH] merge: Run commit-msg hook
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jul 26, 2016, 13:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.2.20.1607261456480.14111@virtualbox>
- In-Reply-To
- <1469519323-11420-1-git-send-email-orgad.shaneh@audiocodes.com>
Hi Orgad,
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, Orgad Shaneh wrote:
> From: Orgad Shaneh <orgads@gmail.com>
Again, this is unnecessary if you already send the mail from the same address.
> commit-msg is needed to either validate the commit message or edit it. > Gerrit for instance uses this hook to append its Change-Id footer. > > This is relevant to merge commit just like any other commit.
Hmm. This is not very convincing to me, as
- if you call commit-msg in `git merge` now, why not `prepare-commit-msg`?
- a merge is a different beast from a simple commit. That is why we have two different commands for them. A hook to edit the merge message may need to know the *second* parent commit, too, for example to generate a diffstat, or to add information about changes in an "evil commit".
- if Gerrit is the intended user, would it not make more sense to introduce a new hook, e.g. `merge-msg` (and `prepare-merge-msg`), as you have to teach Gerrit a new trick anyway?
- if Gerrit is the intended user, why does it not simply edit the merge message itself? After all, it executes it, and probably crafts a merge message mentioning that this is an automatic merge, anyway, so why not add the Change-Id *then*?
Ciao, Dscho