Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2016, #05; Tue, 26)
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jan 27, 2016, 10:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.2.20.1601271120150.2964@virtualbox>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqr3h3amtk.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
Hi Junio,
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 29 quoted lines
> * js/mingw-tests (2016-01-26) 20 commits > - mingw: skip a test in t9130 that cannot pass on Windows > - mingw: do not bother to test funny file names > - mingw: handle the missing POSIXPERM prereq in t9124 > - mingw: avoid illegal filename in t9118 > - mingw: mark t9100's test cases with appropriate prereqs > - Avoid absolute path in t0008 > - mingw: work around pwd issues in the tests > - mingw: fix t9700's assumption about directory separators > - mingw: skip test in t1508 that fails due to path conversion > - tests: turn off git-daemon tests if FIFOs are not available > - mingw: disable mkfifo-based tests > - mingw: accomodate t0060-path-utils for MSYS2 > - mingw: fix t5601-clone.sh > - mingw: let lstat() fail with errno == ENOTDIR when appropriate > - mingw: try to delete target directory before renaming > - mingw: prepare the TMPDIR environment variable for shell scripts > - mingw: factor out Windows specific environment setup > - Git.pm: stop assuming that absolute paths start with a slash > - mingw: do not trust MSYS2's MinGW gettext.sh > - mingw: let's use gettext with MSYS2 > (this branch uses js/msys2.) > > Updates test scripts to remove assumptions that are not portable > between Git for POSIX and Git for Windows, or to skip ones with > expectations that are not satisfiable on Git for Windows. > > Looks mostly done, but I had to tweak a few things, so > Waiting for re-test.
Will re-submit with additional tweaks.
Show 9 quoted lines
> * js/xmerge-maker-eol (2016-01-26) 2 commits > - merge-file: ensure that conflict sections match eol style > - merge-file: let conflict markers match end-of-line style of the context > > The low-level merge machinery has been taught to use CRLF line > termination when inserting conflict markers to merged contents that > are themselves CRLF line-terminated. > > Will merge to 'next'.
There is one more tweak I introduced, and will resubmit: the test case did not test the intended 3 out of the 4 conflict markers.
Ciao, Dscho