Re: Having Git follow symlinks
- From
Peter Krefting <peter@softwolves.pp.se>
- Date
- Jan 30, 2014, 09:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.2.00.1401300958320.30100@ds9.cixit.se>
- In-Reply-To
- <CALKQrgf5o-ZcaeqXLm3P7RpK2yPcFd_HnG4ewwoEGESduyDSjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Johan Herland:
> I believe a preferable way to manage dotfiles in Git, is to have a > script that does the necessary setup/installation from the repo > (that lives in some subdirectory of ~) and into ~.
Yeah, but then I have copies of the files, instead of having the files themselves under version control, meaning I need to copy them back to push changes back, or to merge them. That is undesirable :-/
I do have a setup script for the CVS repo, but it just sets the symlinks up.
The only solution I can see is to split the repo up into several parts, one for each sub-directory that I previously had symlinked. Not perfect, but I guess I can live with that.
-- \\// Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/