Re: Questions about branches in git
- From
Peter Krefting <peter@softwolves.pp.se>
- Date
- Jan 29, 2010, 10:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.2.00.1001291106140.25954@ds9.cixit.se>
- In-Reply-To
- <b4087cc51001281203q1f467480sdf848c9d3ced323b@mail.gmail.com>
Michael Witten:
> However, I've been thinking for a while that it would be useful to have > übercommits (they don't exist) that are treated like single commits but > that actually encapsulate multiple continguous commits.
Your "übercommits" can easily be faked by wrapping the project up in a git submodule. The supermodule (which would just contain one entry -- the project you are "übercommit-tracking") would then contain one single commit for each set of commits you wish to publish.
I'm not sure such a work-flow makes much sense, though. Annotated tags are probably a better idea.
-- \\// Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/