Re: [ANNOUNCE] codeBeamer MR - Easy ACL for Git
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Intland Software wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> More precisely: parts of the source code are actually open, including
> the wiki plugins and the remote clients, for instance. The core source
> is closed, because the same core is also used in our commercial offerings,
> and
> our commercial license doesn't (currently) allow publishing the
> complete code. We have quite some large customers from the defense space
> that would not be happy if we opened everything ;)
are you sure? did you see the recent memo about OpenSource by the DOD?
David Lang
Show 17 quoted lines
> We are currently in the midst of rethinking our licensing scheme
> in general, to make things more liberal or to set up some kind of a
> dual license.
>
>> I think a lot of people wonder now, how does this compare to existing
>> solutions; from your announcement I thought it's something like
>> Gitosis/Gitolite, but in fact it seems more similar to Gitorious or
>> GitHub (if it was publicly available, of course); perhaps it would be
>> good idea to present comparison to these on the project homepage.
> Good point. More on this later.
> ---
> Intland
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>