RE:
- From
- david@lang.hm <david@lang.hm>
- Date
- May 7, 2009, 23:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.10.0905071629230.15782@asgard>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.2.01.0905071613130.4983@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, 7 May 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
> On Thu, 7 May 2009, david@lang.hm wrote: >> >> what about a reset --hard? (is there any command that would force the files to >> be re-written, no matter what git thinks is already there) > > No, not "git reset --hard" either, I think. Git very much tries to avoid > rewriting files, and if you've told it that file contents are stable, it > will believe you. > > In fact, I think people used CE_VALID explicitly for the missing parts of > "partial checkouts", so if we'd suddenly start writing files despite them > being marked as ok in the tree, I think we'd have broken that part. > > (Although again - I'm not sure who would use CE_VALID and friends). > > If you want to force everything to be rewritten, you should just remove > the index (or remove the specific entries in it if you want to do it just > to a particular file) and then do a "git checkout" to re-read and > re-populate the tree. > > But I'm not really seeing why you want to do this. If you told git that it > shouldn't care about the working tree, why do you now want it do care?
to be able to manually recover from the case where someone did things that they weren't supposed to
removing the index and doing a checkout would be a reasonable thing to do (at least conceptually), I will admit that I don't remember ever seeing a command (or discussion of one) that would let me do that.