Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2009, #03; Mon, 19)

> On Monday 19 October 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > * jh/notes (2009-10-09) 22 commits.
> >  - fast-import: Proper notes tree manipulation using the notes API
> >  - Refactor notes concatenation into a flexible interface for combining notes
> >  - Notes API: Allow multiple concurrent notes trees with new struct notes_tree
> >  - Notes API: for_each_note(): Traverse the entire notes tree with a callback
> >  - Notes API: get_note(): Return the note annotating the given object
> >  - Notes API: add_note(): Add note objects to the internal notes tree structure
> >  - Notes API: init_notes(): Initialize the notes tree from the given notes ref
> >  - Notes API: get_commit_notes() -> format_note() + remove the commit restriction
> >  - Add selftests verifying concatenation of multiple notes for the same commit
> >  - Refactor notes code to concatenate multiple notes annotating the same object
> >  - Add selftests verifying that we can parse notes trees with various fanouts
> >  - Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes
> >  - Teach notes code to free its internal data structures on request
> >  - Add '%N'-format for pretty-printing commit notes
> >  - Add flags to get_commit_notes() to control the format of the note string
> >  - t3302-notes-index-expensive: Speed up create_repo()
> >  - fast-import: Add support for importing commit notes
> >  - Teach "-m <msg>" and "-F <file>" to "git notes edit"
> >  - Add an expensive test for git-notes
> >  - Speed up git notes lookup
> >  - Add a script to edit/inspect notes
> >  - Introduce commit notes
> 
> > Is this good for 'next' now?
> 
> Not all of it.
> 
> I suspect the first 14 patches are stable and 'next'-worthy, although
> it would be nice if Dscho had the time to ACK them.