Re: Add Gitweb support for LZMA compressed snapshots
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Aug 1, 2009, 12:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0908011431060.8306@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <94a0d4530907310845k51dbafbfy8e240467113dfc16@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Johannes > Schindelin<Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > > >> BTW. I wonder if it would be good idea to add support for this format > >> directly to git-archive... OTOH it would mean additional dependency. > > > > I don't think it would be a good idea; we do not have bzip2 support > > either. > > bzip2 has no advantages whatsoever.
Bzzzzt. Wrong. Just because you cannot see them does not mean it has no advantages.
> AFAIK xz is superior to other formats and it would be nice to see git > make a technological stance encouraging xz.
Bzzzt. Wrong again. Git's mission in life is not to encourage one compression over another.
If at all, the only compression Git actually does promote in a sense is zlib compression.
> > The only reason we have inbuilt gzip and zip support is because the > > format is so similar to Git's own compression. > > Personally I don't see the point of having zip support.
Personally, I see the point of having zip support. It makes things easy for Windows users. And it's an established format, much more so than tar.gz.
Ciao, Dscho