Re: [RFC PATCH] git push: Push nothing if no refspecs are given or configured
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Mar 6, 2009, 12:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0903061306450.10279@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090306114812.GA19534@pvv.org>
Hi,
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, Finn Arne Gangstad wrote:
Show 27 quoted lines
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 02:32:53AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes: > > > > > On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Sverre Rabbelier wrote: > > > > > >> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 23:25, Markus Heidelberg > > >> <markus.heidelberg@web.de> wrote: > > >> > Oh, I confused "config option" with "command line argument"... > > >> > > >> Right, I'd like to be able to do: > > >> $ git config push.iamnotretarded true > > >> $ git push > > > > > > LOL! Sverre, you have a way to crack me up... > > > > I found it amusing, too. > > > > It may have some correlation with how well organized your work habit is, > > but I do not think it has much correlation with being retarded. It is > > more about "'matching refs' is the perfect default for _my_ use pattern, > > don't mess with it, please". > > So here is my current WIP suggestion for a new "push.default" > variable, I am not sure if a single entry can express all useful > choices, or if it is a good idea to introduce more default choices > other than "nothing" (with the goal of making it the default in a > later release).
Speaking of which, Steffen (who cannot reply right now, since he is AFK for a while) had a patch to install "remote.<branch>.push = HEAD" with clone and remote. Would that be better?
Ciao, Dscho