Re: [PATCH] Windows: Fix intermittent failures of t7701
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jan 28, 2009, 12:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0901281341330.3586@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090128042814.GA18216@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Hi,
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Jeff King wrote:
Show 25 quoted lines
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 05:42:03PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > We want to catch failures of test-chmtime; but since it appears in a > > > pipe, we cannot access its exit code. Therefore, we at least make sure > > > that it prints time stamps of all files that are passed on its command > > > line. > > > > I use this trick in my valgrind series: > > > > ($PROGRAM; echo $? > exit.code) | $OTHER_PROGRAM && > > test 0 = "$(cat exit.code)" > > Oh, that's far too readable. How about: > > exec 3>&1 > status=$( ( ($PROGRAM ; echo $? >&4) | $OTHER_PROGRAM >&3) 4>&1 ) > exec 3>&- > > But seriously, I think if we are talking about tests, then > > $PROGRAM >output && > $OTHER_PROGRAM <output > > is very clear to read, and as a bonus makes "output" accessible for > viewing when the test breaks.
The real problem is that in my case, OTHER_PROGRAM=tee.
But you're right, Hannes was talking about tests, where it might even make sense to have a record of what was passed between the two programs.
Ciao, Dscho