Re: friendlier names
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jan 27, 2009, 18:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0901271910070.3586@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090127153837.GB1321@spearce.org>
Hi,
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> David Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> wrote: > > > > For example, why couldn't the "index" be called the "stage" instead? > > That, along with knowing that "git add" was a synonym for "git stage" > > would have flattened the learning curve considerably for me. > > Historical reasons... > > Waaay back the "index" was an index of the files git knows about in > your working directory. It made sense to call it an index, as like > a book index it was a full listing of what's here, sorted by name. > > That's pre-1.0 days. Like the very first version Linus ever > released. Aka commit e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290.
Actually, it was known by the name "dircache" back then :-)
Ciao, Dscho