Re: current git kernel has strange problems during bisect
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jan 11, 2009, 20:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0901112150110.3586@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <87tz85fuxr.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Hi,
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009, Andi Kleen wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes: > > > > For bisect purposes, if you know you're not chasing down a btrfs issue, > > you can do > > > > git bisect good 34353029534a08e41cfb8be647d734b9ce9ebff8 > > Could you perhaps add some standard tag for that commit? That > would make it easier than to always find the exact btrfs commit. > > Just an idea.
Well, AFAICT what Linus hinted at is that you do not need such a standard tag. Indeed, you would only clutter the history with such tags, when it usually is just a matter of saying "git bisect good" whenever you _know_ you are hitting known-good history.
Ciao, Dscho