Re: timestamps not git-cloned
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Nov 28, 2008, 13:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0811281418530.30769@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <200811281358.24592.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>
Hi,
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Robin Rosenberg wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> I recommend every new Git user to scan the FAQ. It's not just clone, > it's in everything git does in the file system. There is a very good > reason git behaves this way in general, although clone could be > exception, but then we would have a ton of questions about that > inconsistency.
No, clone cannot be an exception. The information is just not stored, and for a good reason: a file's timestamp is nothing you want to commit in source code management. It just does not make sense at all.
Ciao, Dscho