Re: [PATCH 1/2] git-rebase-interactive: do not squash commits on abort
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Sep 9, 2008, 14:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0809091616200.13830@pacific.mpi-cbg.de.mpi-cbg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v7i9mdvyr.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Hi,
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 42 quoted lines
> Dmitry Potapov <dpotapov@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > If git rebase interactive is stopped by "edit" command and then the user
> > said "git rebase --continue" while having some stage changes, git rebase
> > interactive is trying to amend the last commit by doing:
> > git --soft reset && git commit
> >
> > However, the user can abort commit for some reason by providing an empty
> > log message, and that would leave the last commit undone, while the user
> > being completely unaware about what happened. Now if the user tries to
> > continue, by issuing "git rebase --continue" that squashes two previous
> > commits.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Potapov <dpotapov@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > git-rebase--interactive.sh | 7 +++++--
> > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/git-rebase--interactive.sh b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> > index 929d681..5b2b1e5 100755
> > --- a/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> > +++ b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> > @@ -429,12 +429,15 @@ do
> > die "Cannot find the author identity"
> > if test -f "$DOTEST"/amend
> > then
> > + amend=$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD)
> > git reset --soft HEAD^ ||
> > die "Cannot rewind the HEAD"
> > fi
> > export GIT_AUTHOR_NAME GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL GIT_AUTHOR_DATE &&
> > - git commit --no-verify -F "$DOTEST"/message -e ||
> > - die "Could not commit staged changes."
> > + git commit --no-verify -F "$DOTEST"/message -e || {
> > + test -n "$amend" && git reset --soft $amend
> > + die "Could not commit staged changes."
> > + }
> > fi
>
> Feels obviously correct from a cursory look, although I admit I haven't
> thought about other possible corner cases that this additional reset may
> fire when it shouldn't. Dscho?It might be safer to set the variable "amend" to empty before the "if". Other than that, I think that patch makes tons of sense.
Thanks, Dscho