Re: [PATCH] "git shell" won't work, need "git-shell"
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Aug 25, 2008, 18:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0808252015080.24820@pacific.mpi-cbg.de.mpi-cbg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <37fcd2780808251020j1ef51b38h7c6d6e8f050a92ce@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, Dmitry Potapov wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> wrote: > > > > Can we agree that direct calls of libexec stuff should never be part > > of the "official" interface (i.e. not workarounds for deprecated > > usage)? > > Agreed. It looks somewhat strange to type the libexec path in > /etc/passwd.
FWIW I do not agree. IMNHO libexec/ is just a way to organize executable parts of any software package that are usually not called from the command line. And a login shell qualifies for that.
Show 6 quoted lines
> > Considering that calling the git-shell executable directly is the > > _only_ sensible way of using this interface, it should follow that it > > has to be in /usr/bin, no matter if users type this command or not. > > Perhaps, /usr/sbin would be a better place, as it is intended only for > system administration binaries.
Does it not strike you as odd, then, that "sh" -- by far the most common login shell -- does not live in /usr/sbin/?
Ciao, Dscho