Re: [RFC PATCH 00/12] Sparse checkout
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jul 23, 2008, 16:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0807231753240.8986@racer>
- In-Reply-To
- <fcaeb9bf0807230921m114f5ae0ybfec4917432d6dc7@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
Show 21 quoted lines
> On 7/23/08, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote: > > > > > So in short, sparse prefix will be stored in config, > > > core.sparsecheckout. > > > > Do you really think the prefix should be stored anywhere else than the > > index? > > > > With core.sparseCheckout you have to introduce a _sh*tload_ of config > > loaders. > > > > And with core.sparseCheckout you are at the whim of the user, since > > .git/config is _supposed_ to be user-editable. > > > > From a logical point of view, I'd say that the sparse prefix has > > nothing to do with the "configuration" of the local repository. > > Well, whatever place. I chose .git/config because I did not want to > introduce a new config place. But then how about .git/sparsecheckout?
No, I did mean the index. This is an attribute of the index: either it is sparsely checked out or not. You can even have multiple indices (switching between them by setting GIT_INDEX_FILE) which have different prefixes.
Ciao, Dscho "who seems to recall that the first series was much less intrusive"