Re: [PATCH] builtin-rerere: fix conflict markers parsing
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jul 7, 2008, 15:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0807071627020.18205@racer>
- In-Reply-To
- <48722BD9.4090406@free.fr>
Hi,
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Olivier Marin wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin a écrit : > > > > Okay, but then the obvious question is: what do you do about "<<<<<<" > > lines that are not a marker? > > The answer is the same.
I think not. You say you want to do something about the ambiguity, but fact is: the conflict markers are ambiguous. They always have been, will ever be, and I do not even have to argue for it. Or do I?
> > Same remark as before: if you fix rerere, why not do it properly? > > If you have a better fix send a patch or at least give me some clues.
Did I not say that the index has enough information? Or at least hint at it?
Of course, we could run with your solution. But that only fixes a corner case, right?
So a proper fix will be needed eventually anyway.
And no, I will not work on it: this is not my itch, and my time is being stolen too much already, these days.
Ciao, Dscho