Re: [PATCH 1/2] parse_options: Add flag to prevent errors for further processing
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jun 23, 2008, 20:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0806232124130.6440@racer>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v4p7khqp7.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Hi,
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes: > > > On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, Shawn Bohrer wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:52:42AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > I believe not. I think that Junio prefers some callback that can > > handle a whole bunch of options (as opposed to the callback we can > > have now, to handle arguments for a specific option). > > Sorry, no. I do not want callbacks. I've been saying that parser > cascading is easier if you use an incremental interface like diff option > parser does.
Sorry, I misunderstood. At least you clarified it for me now.
Thanks, Dscho