Re: Adding files to a git-archive when it is generated, and whats the best way to find out what branch a commit is on?

> 2009/7/29 Santi Béjar <santi@agolina.net>:
>> 2009/7/29 demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com>:
>>> 2009/7/29 Santi Béjar <santi@agolina.net>:
>>>> 2009/7/29 demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com>:
>>>>> Another question is whether anyone has any advice on the best way to
>>>>> find out the "best" branch an arbitrary commit is on. Where best can
>>>>> be flexibly definied to handle commits that are reachable from
>>>>> multiple branches.  I have hacked a solution involving git-log and
>>>>> grep, but it performs quite poorly. I was wondering if there is a
>>>>> better solution.
>>>>
>>>> The "best" tag is easy: git describe commit. For branches I think you
>>>> could use "git name-ref --refs=refs/heads/* commit", because git
>>>> describe does not have a --branches flag.
>>>
>>> Dang, I guess this is from a newer release than mine. So now i have an
>>> excuse to upgrade.
>>
>> No, it is quite old (the --refs flag since the v1.5.1). If the problem
>> is that you don't find the "git name-ref" command is because it is
>> "git name-rev", oops.
>
> Dang, guess i need a different excuse. :-)
>
> But it doesn't seem to do what i need:
>
> $ git name-rev --refs=refs/heads/* faa7dc9f4d3a618b0ad8b3c95edd54e24c6976e7
> faa7dc9f4d3a618b0ad8b3c95edd54e24c6976e7 undefined
>
> But i think that just because in this case I need remote refs:
>
> git name-rev --refs=refs/remotes/* faa7dc9f4d3a618b0ad8b3c95edd54e24c6976e7
> faa7dc9f4d3a618b0ad8b3c95edd54e24c6976e7 remotes/origin/maint-5.005~25
>
> Which is definitely better. Can I safely strip the ~25 off the end to
> get the real branch name?