Re: [PATCH] branch: rework the descriptions of rename and copy operations
- From
Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 20, 2024, 19:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <ad20099a-918d-4c37-8d5c-20c3f491728a@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <be91f3ad9305366c1385c2da4881537e@manjaro.org>
On 18-feb-2024 21:38:54, Dragan Simic wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Regarding the branch copy and rename operations and their argument > names, perhaps the following would be a good choice: > > --copy [<branch>] <destination> > --move [<branch>] <destination> > > It would clearly reflect the nature of the performed operations, while > still using "<branch>" consistently, this time to refer to the source > branch. Using "<destination>" to select the destination name should > be pretty much self-descriptive, if you agree.
Sorry, but I don't. Actually, I don't see the logic with <destination>.
I appreciate your efforts to provide consistency, but the current ones seem better options to me: either <oldbranch> and <newbranch>, or the shortened ones: <old> and <new>.
Thanks.