On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 03:44:08AM +0000, Ramsay Jones wrote:
Show 38 quoted lines
>
> On 20/03/2026 02:04, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> >
> > On 20/03/2026 1:35 am, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > > Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Hi Patrick,
> > > >
> > > > When you next re-roll your 'ps/object-counting' branch, could you please squash this
> > > > into the patch equivalent to the commit 2b24db1110 ("object-file: generalize counting
> > > > objects",2026-03-12) in tonight's 'seen' branch.
> > > The topic being in 'next' since March 17th, that is a bit awkward to
> > > arrange. I can queue the fix on top instead.
> > Hmm, odd. I didn't do a 'branch --contains', obviously, but this only started tonight
> > (and I built git yesterday - master, next and seen), so I just assumed ... ;)
> >
> > Sorry about that.
> >
>
> Heh, I could not sleep, so took another look! :)
>
>
> The problem was actually caused by the 'ps/odb-generic-object-name-handling'
> branch and commit 936c2bfecb ("odb: introduce
>
> `struct odb_for_each_object_options`", 2026-03-19). In particular, that
> commit changes the type of the last parameter of the
>
> odb_source_loose_for_each_object() function from 'unsigned' to 'const struct
> odb_for_each_object_options *', without
>
> changing one call site from '0' to 'NULL'.
>
>
> OK, I can go to bed now!