Re: [PATCH] quiltimport: fix backslash expansion in patch subjects
- From
- Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
- Date
- Mar 9, 2026, 01:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <aa4i5TDt7uPYw9Jq@laps>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqa4wh96qr.fsf@gitster.g>
On Sun, Mar 08, 2026 at 05:38:52PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
>Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> writes: > >> echo interprets backslash sequences, so a patch with "\0" in its > >"Some implementations of echo"; I think it is in XSI but the >plain vanilla POSIX makes it "implementation-defined".
I had to Google this one :)
I'll reword to "Some implementations of echo (notably dash) interpret backslash sequences by default; POSIX leaves this behavior implementation-defined."
Show 48 quoted lines
>> subject has that expanded into a NUL byte, which git commit-tree >> rejects. >> >> Use printf '%s\n' instead, which doesn't interpret the string. >> >> Also quote $tmp_dir to handle paths with spaces. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> >> --- >> git-quiltimport.sh | 10 +++++----- >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/git-quiltimport.sh b/git-quiltimport.sh >> index eb34cda409..38302d28c9 100755 >> --- a/git-quiltimport.sh >> +++ b/git-quiltimport.sh >> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ tmp_info="$tmp_dir/info" >> # Find the initial commit >> commit=$(git rev-parse HEAD) >> >> -mkdir $tmp_dir || exit 2 >> +mkdir "$tmp_dir" || exit 2 >> while read patch_name level garbage <&3 >> do >> case "$patch_name" in ''|'#'*) continue;; esac >> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ do >> echo "$patch_name doesn't exist. Skipping." >> continue >> fi >> - echo $patch_name >> + printf '%s\n' "$patch_name" > >Unquoted "$patch_name" in the original fed to "echo" is doing more >than just backslash 0. > > patch_name="My casual patch" > >would be split into three tokens, runs of multiple spaces in the >original will be squashed into one, and "My casual patch" would have >been the result, which people may have appreciated as cleaning up a >sloppy original patch title. > >The updated version will give completely different result, losing >the "cleaning up" feature and parrotting the garbage input to >garbage output. > >So I am not 100% convinced that this change would not result in >robbing Peter to pay Paul.
patch_name is read from the series file via:
while read patch_name level garbage <&3
Since read splits on IFS, patch_name only ever gets the first whitespace delimited token. So in the normal case it can never contain internal whitespace, and the word splitting in echo is a noop:
$ printf 'my-patch.patch -p1\n' |
while read name level garbage; do
echo "name=[$name]"
done
name=[my-patch.patch]The only way patch_name gets internal spaces is if the series file uses "\ " escaping, but in that case the spaces should be (??) intentional.
>Likewise for the next hunk.
Same reasoning applies to the SUBJECT fallback, I think...
SUBJECT=$(echo $patch_name | sed -e 's/.patch$//')
patch_name is still the same single token from read. And the old path was already quoted:
echo "$SUBJECT"
So the only issue there was backslash interpretation, rather than splitting? similar to 47be066026 ("rebase -i: do not "echo" random user-supplied strings")?
I need a beer.
-- Thanks, Sasha