Re: [PATCH 7/9] reftable/stack: add function to check if optimization is required
- From
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
- Date
- Oct 10, 2025, 11:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <aOjsgQge8Wqh4odB@pks.im>
- In-Reply-To
- <20251010-562-add-option-to-check-if-reference-backend-needs-repacking-v1-7-c7962be584fa@gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 12:27:11PM +0200, Karthik Nayak wrote:
> The reftable backend for references, performs auto-compaction as part of
s/for references, //
> its regular flow. This allows it to stay optimized.
Maybe: "flow, which is required to keep the number of tables part of a stack at bay."
Show 10 quoted lines
> diff --git a/reftable/reftable-stack.h b/reftable/reftable-stack.h
> index d70fcb705d..754e955206 100644
> --- a/reftable/reftable-stack.h
> +++ b/reftable/reftable-stack.h
> @@ -123,6 +123,9 @@ struct reftable_log_expiry_config {
> int reftable_stack_compact_all(struct reftable_stack *st,
> struct reftable_log_expiry_config *config);
>
> +/* check if heuristic based compaction is required */
> +int reftable_stack_compaction_required(struct reftable_stack *st, bool *required);Let's use a full sentence here, starting with an upper-case letter and ending with punctuation.
Show 25 quoted lines
> diff --git a/reftable/stack.c b/reftable/stack.c
> index 9d9326ce0e..732141d46c 100644
> --- a/reftable/stack.c
> +++ b/reftable/stack.c
> @@ -1652,6 +1652,24 @@ static int stack_segments_for_compaction(struct reftable_stack *st,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +int reftable_stack_compaction_required(struct reftable_stack *st, bool *required)
> +{
> + struct segment seg;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + if (st->merged->tables_len < 2) {
> + *required = false;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + err = stack_segments_for_compaction(st, &seg);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + *required = segment_size(&seg) > 0;
> + return 0;
> +}Okay, makes sense. If we have at least one segment that we'd perform compaction for we return true, otherwise false.
Patrick