Re: [Q] Changing the current branch (HEAD) in a bare repository - how?
Show 13 quoted lines
> Date: Friday 06 June 2008
> Subject: Re: [Q] Changing the current branch (HEAD) in a bare repository - how?
> From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
>
> "Brian Foster" <brian.foster@innova-card.com> writes:
>> Using git 1.5.2.5 (Kubuntu 7.10) and a bare repository,
>> I [ essentially swapped branch names `master' and `foo' ].
>> Now, how do I change the current branch to the (new)
>> `master'? [ ... ]
>
> In a bare repository it doesn't matter (almost) which branch is
> current one (there is no _checked out_ branch, so it only matters
> as a default checked out branch for clone, IIRC).
Jakub,
Yes, I also believe that is the case (but have not confirmed).
The reason for the exercise is the bare repository in question
will be cloned by newbies, and I want things to "just work"
out-of-the-box. The (new) `master' is the development mainline
(broadly meaning what has passed (usually my) review), and as
such is nominally what Patches should be generated against.
(It didn't start out that way due to some convoluted history that
is not relevant.) Hence --- with the caveat I'm also rather new
to git --- it seems wise to ensure the default checked-out branch
after a clone represents the nominal development line. (Of course,
I need/want to encourage the use of topic branches, but I see that
as a rather different issue.)
Show 7 quoted lines
>> I (ultimately) hand-edited `HEAD' [ as Dscho suggested ].
>
> You have to rely on plumbing:
>
> $ git symbolic-ref HEAD master
>
> (see documentation for details).
Ah! Thanks for the hint.
cheers!
-blf-
--
"How many surrealists does it take to | Brian Foster
change a lightbulb? Three. One calms | somewhere in south of France
the warthog, and two fill the bathtub | Stop E$$o (ExxonMobil)!
with brightly-coloured machine tools." | http://www.stopesso.com