Re: [PATCH v2 Outreachy] t7011: ensure no whitespace after redirect
- From
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
- Date
- Oct 23, 2024, 09:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <ZxjIC5W4HprJqUxB@pks.im>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAGedMtdN8qRRALiYdCFso90ExGEm0zirnpLXuva_bc8ehsK+Xw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 08:24:18AM +0100, Seyi Chamber wrote:
Show 35 quoted lines
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 at 06:00, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 06:11:17PM +0100, Seyi Chamber wrote: > > > On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 at 20:58, Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 06:17:06PM +0100, Seyi Chamber wrote: > > > > > Yay! > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for the feedback @Patrick Steinhardt @Kristoffer Haugsbakk > > > > > > > > Thanks, all. Let's start merging this one down. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Taylor > > > > > > Thanks, Taylor! > > > > > > I've also discovered that the test script t9101-git-svn-props.sh also > > > requires the same update done in this patch. > > > Is this test script currently being worked on? @Patrick Steinhardt > > > > Not that I'd know of. I typically double check via lore by searching for > > the relevant subsystem [1]. This only surfaces your mail and the Meson > > patch series, so at least nobody else has communicated intent to work on > > it. > > > > Patrick > > > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/?q=t9101 > > Thanks, Patrick. > > In the future, would you prefer I still run it by you before working > on a test script, > or should I apply the same strategy you mentioned in your reply?
There's no need to run it by anybody, so please feel free to use the same strategy.
Patrick