Re: [PATCH 0/3] Branches are branches and not heads

> On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 01:05:36PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Back when Git started, we used the word "head" to mean the tip of
> > possibly multiple histories, and that is where the name of the
> > hierarchy .git/refs/heads/ came from.  But these days we call these
> > entities "branches" in human terms, and "head" is still used to refer
> > to the tip of the history each of these branches represent.
> > 
> > When asking "git ls-remote" or "git show-ref" to limit their output to
> > branches (as opposed to showing any ref), we use "--heads" for
> > historical reasons, but give the option a more human friendly name
> > "--branches", and demote "--heads" to the status of a deprecated
> > synonym.  This would eventually allow us to remove them at the
> > breaking version boundary.
> 
> All of this sounds like a very sensible step, to me.
> 
> I've left a couple of nits;  none important.