Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] reftable/reader: add comments to `table_iter_next()`

> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> 
> > While working on the optimizations in the preceding patches I stumbled
> > upon `table_iter_next()` multiple times. It is quite easy to miss the
> > fact that we don't call `table_iter_next_in_block()` twice, but that the
> > second call is in fact `table_iter_next_block()`.
> >
> > Add comments to explain what exactly is going on here to make things
> > more obvious. While at it, touch up the code to conform to our code
> > style better.
> >
> > Note that one of the refactorings merges two conditional blocks into
> > one. Before, we had the following code:
> >
> > ```
> > err = table_iter_next_block(&next, ti
> 
> ");"???