Re: [PATCH] git-clone.txt: document -4 and -6

> Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:
>
> > Note that the 'clone' and 'fetch' versions for many of these options
> > have different wording. For example, in Documentation/git-clone.txt we
> > have:
> >
> >     -j::
> >     --jobs=<n>::
> >            Number of parallel children to be used for all forms of fetching.
> >
> > Whereas the description in the original fetch-options.txt is more
> > verbose.
>
> Yes, so it will be impossible to unify without changing the
> resulting text.  But unless one description is clearly better for
> one subcommand while the other description is also clearly better
> for the other subcommand, we should be able to pick a better one
> that would serve both subcommands, and that way we would improve
> description for one subcommand while keeping the other one the same,
> right?