Re: [PATCH 1/3] merge-ort: add new merge_ort_generic() function
- From
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
- Date
- Mar 12, 2025, 20:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Z9HnysAkF6P9uUg6@nand.local>
- In-Reply-To
- <Z9FAgCSCZSJnzv9d@pks.im>
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 09:06:24AM +0100, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> These two hunks look related to my above observation that we don't have > the check for `num_merge_bases == 1`, as in "merge-recursive.c" we used > to set `opt->ancestor = "constructed merge base" if so.
Yeah, I noticed the same thing and agree that it would be helpful to see that spelled out in the commit message.
Thanks, Taylor