Re: [PATCH v2] doc(send-email): use correct name of the --signed-off-by-cc in git send-email doc
- From
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
- Date
- Feb 18, 2025, 11:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Z7RtXXsDRxuEqCgC@pks.im>
- In-Reply-To
- <20250218085913.1381537-1-mcepl@cepl.eu>
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 09:58:38AM +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> I don’t think there is an option --signed-off-cc (without -by) > for git send-email. > > Signed-off-by: Matěj Cepl <mcepl@cepl.eu> > --- > Rebase on the top of the current master (Whoops!) and improve the commit message.
It's better, but still not quite there:
- The subject now uses `doc(send-email)`, which is an idiom we don't
use over here.- The commit message still doesn't use imperative mood.
I know, we're quite pedantic about commit messages over here, but please bear with us :) How about this instead:
docs: fix misspelled `--no-signed-off-by-cc` in git-send-email(1)
In git-send-email(1) we reference the `--no-signed-off-cc` command
line argument. This argument does not exist and never has existed,
but it is an obvious misspelling of `--no-signed-off-by-cc`.Fix the misspelled argument.
Signed-off-by: ...
It would also be great if you send future revisions of a patch series in the same thread. You can do so via `--in-reply-to`, where the parameter is the message ID of the first message of the first version of your patch series.
Thanks!
Patrick