Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] refs: skip collision checks in initial transactions

> Hi
> 
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024, at 08:51, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> > While we generally cannot avoid the first check, the second check is
> > superfluous in cases where the transaction is an initial one in an
> > otherwise empty ref store. The check results in multiple ref reads as
> > well as the creation of a ref iterator for every ref we're checking,
> > which adds up quite fast when performing the check for many refs.
> >
> > Introduce a new flag that allows us to skip this check and wire it up in
> > such that the backends pass it when running an initial transaction. This
> 
> Missing word? “wire it up in such that”.
> 
> Maybe: “wire it up so that”.