git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH 1/3] sparse-checkout: fix OOM error with mixed patterns

From
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Date
Sep 21, 2021, 16:35 UTC
Message-ID
<YUoJxgiWcl/Wcqce@nand.local>
In-Reply-To
<6d565e1d-a31f-7cf0-9c10-a01a87fead41@gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 09:06:59AM -0400, Derrick Stolee wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> > If we are preparing to make it so that we do not blindly copy patterns
> > from a sparse checkout without cone mode enabled, then wouldn't this new
> > case be a BUG()?
> >
> > Of course, users could still tweak the contents of their sparse-checkout
> > file as they wish, but I'd expect that we'd catch those cases, too
> > (i.e., by validating the contents of the existing sparse-checkout before
> > calling this function).
>
> If I was more confident that we were catching absolutely every possible
> case of non-cone mode patterns in our parsing logic, then I suppose a BUG()
> could apply here. At minimum, at this point in time (before fixing the gap
> in parsing in patch 3) the test below would not even work with test_must_fail,
> since the exit code would be unexpected.
Right, but it could be a test_must_fail after the second patch, no?

Not calling BUG() is fine with me if you think there may be other cases we haven't discovered. But we should have some way to discover them instead if a user can generate them organically. Maybe a warning()?

Show 13 quoted lines
> >> +	git -C bad-patterns sparse-checkout add dir
> >> +'
> >> +
> >
> > In other series I've suggested a cosmetic change to move all of these to
> > a sub-shell that begins with "cd bad-patterns &&", but obviously that is
> > a relatively unimportant suggestion.
>
> The only defense I have for not using a subshell and 'cd' is that later
> I can use an "expect" file in my current directory without it being "in"
> the repository. It doesn't really matter for this example, but it has in
> the past, causing me to do this by habit. A tab is smaller than the string
> " -C bad-patterns", so it's probably worth changing.

Yeah. I admit to hardly caring about this (subshell vs. '-C bad-patterns') at all. Either is completely fine with me.

Thanks, Taylor

Previous: Derrick StoleeNext: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
Message 5 of 10 in “Sparse checkout: fix mixed-mode pattern issues”
  1. 0/3 Sparse checkout: fix mixed-mode pattern issuesDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Sep 20, 2021
  2. 1/3 sparse-checkout: fix OOM error with mixed patternsDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Sep 20, 2021
  3. Taylor BlauSep 20, 2021
  4. Derrick StoleeSep 21, 2021
  5. Taylor BlauSep 21, 2021
  6. 2/3 sparse-checkout: clear patterns when switching modesDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Sep 20, 2021
  7. Taylor BlauSep 20, 2021
  8. Taylor BlauSep 20, 2021
  9. 3/3 sparse-checkout: refuse to add to bad patternsDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Sep 20, 2021
  10. Taylor BlauSep 20, 2021

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.