Re: expired key in junio-gpg-pub
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Sep 7, 2021, 20:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <YTfL/eLKOiJdpH1c@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqbl54b1zn.fsf@gitster.g>
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 12:49:00PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> > Have you extended the expiration on it? I wasn't able to find any > > updates on the keyservers I checked. But regardless, we should probably > > ship an updated one via the tag. > > I am reasonably sure that I've done update with pgp.mit.edu when I > refreshed the expiration last time, but apparently I didn't update > the in-tree copy. I doubt that it is a good practice to ship the > public key used to sign things in the repository in the repository > itself, but if are not dropping the tag, I agree I should keep it up > to date.
Yeah, I agree that the is potentially problematic: it's a circular dependency, plus updating tags is awkward, per Ævar's other message.
Perhaps we should replace it with instructions on getting the key?
I tried a blind "gpg --recv-keys" and came up with an old version ("not changed" according to GPG). That hits keys.openpgp.org by default. A lot of the keyservers used to peer with each other, but I've heard that there's less of that these days due to key-spamming attacks (but it's not really something I keep up with).
I admit that I never actually verify git.git's tags anyway (why would I? I'm fetching unsigned branch tips from your repo constantly anyway). I only noticed because I was looking fora bug in "git tag -verify --format". :)
-Peff