Re: [PATCH] xdiff: implement a zealous diff3
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jun 14, 2021, 04:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <YMbexfeUG78yBix4@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <60c647c1d9b5c_41f452089@natae.notmuch>
On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 01:00:33PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> > > I'm re-sending this patch from 2013 because I do think it provides value > > > and we might want to make it the default. > > > > I take it you didn't investigate the segfault I mentioned. > > I don't know how I was supposed to investigate the few segfaults you > mentioned. All you said is that you never tracked the bug.
My point is that if you are going to repost a patch that has known problems, it is worth saying so to give reviewers and the maintainer a realistic idea of how stable it is.
I also didn't have a reproduction recipe. I found the commit I sent by just re-running every merge in git.git in a loop.
It sounds like you have a smaller reproduction and maybe a fix, which is good.
-Peff