Re: Rebase options via git pull

> >> Probably add generic cmd.<cmd>.opts config support, so that I can say:
> >>
> >>   git -c cmd.rebase.opts="--no-fork-point --empty=keep" pull --rebase
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >
> > It's been discussed before (but I did not dig up the discussions,
> > sorry). It's been considered a bad idea, because our commands are a
> > mixture of plumbing/porcelain commands and switches, so we want to be
> > able to reliably invoke say ls-tree with some switches internally,
> > without config tripping us up.
> >
> > Of course we could make this sort of thing work by selectively ignoring
> > the config, but such a thing would be equal in complexity to the effort
> > of assering that it's safe to introduce new rebase.* config in the
> > codebase for every switch it has now, but with a less friendly interface
> > both for git itself and users.
> 
> I don't see much complexity here. We'd then just need to effectively
> invoke ls-tree internally like this:
> 
>    git -c 'cmd.ls-tree.opts=' ls-tree
> 
> Not a big deal.

> > I.e. instead of rebase.noForkPoint=<bool> we'd need to to getopt parsing
> > on some cmd.rebase.opts string.
> 
> As this is meant to be generic, then yes, every command will first parse
> corresponding config option, then command-line options, rebase not being
> any different.
> 
> >
> > I don't see why in this case what I suggested elsewhere in the thread
> > wouldn't be viable, i.e. you specify --rebase or --merge to "pull", and
> > that affects how we interpret the rest of the options. I haven't tried
> > it though, so there may be hidden gotchas there I haven't thought of.