Re: "bad revision" fetch error when fetching missing objects from partial clones
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- May 13, 2021, 09:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <YJz4JTsFjTtL7mE2@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <ba5a0574-c71c-709c-a13c-bf6d5981545c@jeffhostetler.com>
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 02:44:52PM -0400, Jeff Hostetler wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> > > remote: ...<skipped> > > > Receiving objects: 100% (64/64), 154.49 KiB | 2.97 MiB/s, done. > > > remote: ...<skipped> > > > Receiving objects: 100% (37/37), 168.35 KiB | 4.95 MiB/s, done. > > > Resolving deltas: 100% (5/5), done. > > > Resolving deltas: 100% (49/49), completed with 47 local objects. > > > fatal: bad revision 'd5e9cd36ab21839af3d116eff3221c53f6ca7fd6' > > > error: https://<myhost>/bagas/gitea.git did not send all necessary > > > objects > [...] > > I'm not sure why you're getting that error, but you might > also try enabling `uploadpack.allowAnySHA1InWant` > (or one of the other "allow*SHS1InWant" values) and see if > that helps.
That shouldn't be necessary these days, since the v2 protocol allows arbitrary objects to be fetched.
I think it is actually a bug with pack-objects not sending the object, but it only seems to trigger with bitmaps. This works:
git init repo cd repo
echo content >file git add file git commit -m base
git config uploadpack.allowfilter true git clone --no-local --bare --filter=blob:none . clone
cd clone git fetch origin $(git rev-parse HEAD:file)
But if I add a "git repack -adb" in the parent repository before the "cd clone", then I get:
remote: Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0 fatal: bad revision 'd95f3ad14dee633a758d2e331151e950dd13e4ed' error: /home/peff/tmp/repo/. did not send all necessary objects
So presumably this is a bug in the bitmap-aware filtering code that is not present in the regular filter-traversing code. But what really puzzles me is that the result seems totally broken. Yet the test coverage in t5310 passes, and nobody has noticed on major sites like GitHub (which supports partial clones and most certainly has bitmaps enabled).
So I think it will require some digging. My _guess_ is that it has to do with the "never filter out an object that was explicitly requested" rule not being consistently followed. But we'll see.
-Peff