git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH 2/2] t7900: clean up some broken refs

From
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Date
Jan 18, 2021, 16:04 UTC
Message-ID
<YAWxh8O/XlxIfcv3@nand.local>
In-Reply-To
<616b73a6556824fb94753cfcc62bf01d36b8b311.1610940216.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 03:23:36AM +0000, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:
Show 19 quoted lines
> From: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
>
> The tests for the 'prefetch' task create remotes and fetch refs into
> 'refs/prefetch/<remote>/' and tags into 'refs/tags/'. These tests use
> the remotes to create objects not intended to be seen by the "local"
> repository.
>
> In that sense, the incrmental-repack tasks did not have these objects
> and refs in mind. That test replaces the object directory with a
> specific pack-file layout for testing the batch-size logic. However,
> this causes some operations to start showing warnings such as:
>
>  error: refs/prefetch/remote1/one does not point to a valid object!
>  error: refs/tags/one does not point to a valid object!
>
> This only shows up if you run the tests verbosely and watch the output.
> It caught my eye and I _thought_ that there was a bug where 'git gc' or
> 'git repack' wouldn't check 'refs/prefetch/' before pruning objects.
> That is incorrect. Those commands do handle 'refs/prefetch/' correctly.

Do you think it would be worth checking that 'does not point to a valid object' doesn't appear in the output?

Show 22 quoted lines
> All that is left is to clean up the tests in t7900-maintenance.sh to
> remove these tags and refs that are not being repacked for the
> incremental-repack tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
> ---
>  t/t7900-maintenance.sh | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/t/t7900-maintenance.sh b/t/t7900-maintenance.sh
> index f9031cbb44b..6be9d42767a 100755
> --- a/t/t7900-maintenance.sh
> +++ b/t/t7900-maintenance.sh
> @@ -256,6 +256,11 @@ test_expect_success 'incremental-repack task' '
>  	HEAD
>  	^HEAD~1
>  	EOF
> +
> +	# Replace the object directory with this pack layout.
> +	# However, it does not include all objects from the remotes.
> +	rm -rf .git/refs/prefetch &&
> +	rm -rf .git/refs/tags &&

Hmm. Makes sense, but this will certainly need to be updated to work with reftables, and it would break if you ran 'git pack-refs'.

Perhaps instead:
  git for-each-ref --format='delete %(refname)' \
    refs/prefetch refs/tags >refs &&
  git update-ref --stdin <refs
?

Thanks, Taylor

Previous: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetNext: Derrick Stolee
Message 5 of 13 in “Two cleanups around 'prefetch' refs”
  1. 0/2 Two cleanups around 'prefetch' refsDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Jan 18, 2021
  2. 1/2 maintenance: set log.excludeDecoration durin prefetchDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Jan 18, 2021
  3. Taylor BlauJan 18, 2021
  4. 2/2 t7900: clean up some broken refsDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Jan 18, 2021
  5. Taylor BlauJan 18, 2021
  6. Derrick StoleeJan 18, 2021
  7. 0/2 Two cleanups around 'prefetch' refsDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Jan 19, 2021
  8. 1/2 maintenance: set log.excludeDecoration durin prefetchDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Jan 19, 2021
  9. Junio C HamanoJan 21, 2021
  10. 2/2 t7900: clean up some broken refsDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Jan 19, 2021
  11. Junio C HamanoJan 21, 2021
  12. Taylor BlauJan 19, 2021
  13. Junio C HamanoJan 21, 2021

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.